10G Networking for Dummies

timeshifter

Well-Known Member
Reaction score
2,249
Location
USA
Have a small business client, they build customized machinery and the like. 3-4 of their users rely heavily on programs like AutoDesk Inventor. The owner wants to improve load times (and other operations) on his workstation. Based on some experimenting we've done we've decided to upgrade his machine and the server to 10G networking.

I'm in the process of moving the whole network under the UniFi umbrella. Just install a USG Pro, Cloud Key Gen 2, (2) UniFi 6 Lite APs and (1) UniFi FlexHD AP today. They have several switches that I'd like to upgrade at some point in the future too, all 1Gb switches.

So, for this upgrade I'd really really prefer to use a UniFi 10Gb switch.

The only switches that I see in the UniFi line that do 10Gb are these two:

They're both $599. The 6 port one is PoE, but don't really need that and it's out of stock. So I guess that leaves the 16XG?

Would also need NICs which UniFi doesn't make or sell, so I'd need to find what's good there.

Their wiring is ready, CAT6 runs that have been certified.

So I'd be ordering a switch, a couple of NICs and a few patch cords. Am I on the right track?
 
That desktop better be using an NVME SSD, because if it isn't... this is a waste of time. SATA is gigabit, you can't go faster than the slowest link.

As for Unifi switches yes that's all the 10gbit except for the US-48 Gen 1, that has two SFP+s on it, and I think the gen 2 24 port has a pair of SFP+s on it too.
 
It's got two of them along with an Intel Xeon Gold 6138 CPU @ 2.00 GHz, 64GB RAM and an NVidia Quadro P4000.
And the server's drive array?

Though if the desktop is at that level... probably fine too.

The Unifi 16xg is what I've used for backbone work... as for NICs, I get stuff with Intel's name on it.
 
Are you sure? 1 Gbps = 125 MB/s. That SSD has a quoted read speed of 550 MB/s. Which would work out to about 4 Gbps? Not 10, but more than 1?
You're not wrong, but I don't generally see 10gbit being worth it until I have at least a raid 10 made out of those things.
 
So what kind of read speed could we expect with a RAID 10 setup of those drives?
About 80% of 2 times their rated speed. That's after the host OS loads and what not, so might be less if things get busy.

I just know that if I stuff a 10gbit card in a server that's got four of those running RAID 10, I can actually use that 10gbit link. I've never pushed all that to a single station though, that was a file server to support 80 people with gigabit access.
 
Research settings of your NICs...ensure you have good NICs...I also prefer Intel....and not the cheap ones (not "win" NICs...but good hardware controller based NICs).

Check settings on offloading. Test settings regarding jumbo frames, MTU, etc.
 
Which NIC to pick?

ASUS XG-C100C 10G Network Adapter Pci-E X4 Card with Single RJ-45 Port

Intel Ethernet Converged Network Adapter X540-T1 - network adapter - PCIe 2

Others?
 
I stick with Intel when looking for top shelf networking cards. Just make sure and document everything along the communications paths. All the advertised speeds thing remind back in the dialup days when everyone got so excited when 56k modems came out and there weren't huge changes in performance.
 
We put the Gen1 48-port Ubiquiti switch in for a client back in August. Bonded 2x10G ports from the server (Intel NIC), which does have a RAID10 of SSDs. It's overkill, but it absolutely helped throughput to the workstations. They constantly pull X-Ray images from the server to display on workstations, and their practice-management app works much better since, as well.

We looked at the cost difference to a less-overkill solution, and figured it was $2K well-spent to never have to think about that problem again.
 
Yeah, technically we're in that grey space between 1gbit and 10gbit in terms of bandwidth.

And that's why we have 2.5GBASE-T and 5GBASE-T gear on the shelf, but very... VERY few switching options.

For business use though, I just go straight to 10GBASE-T solutions, costs a bit more but not much when compared to the less expensive alternatives and while we might not be able to make full use of it today, we will sometime in the next 3-5 years.

And that means I only really support 10gbit over FIBER, the only copper solution I'll muck with is a DAC cable. 10gbit over copper requires excessively tight tolerances, and it's one of those things that breaks when the air conditioner blows on a cable. I don't have time for that!

That means, the Intel X520-SR1 at a minimum. https://www.amazon.com/Intel-E10G41BFSR-Ethernet-Adapter-X520-SR1/dp/B002IYDH2Y
 
Last edited:
Yeah, technically we're in that grey space between 1gbit and 10gbit in terms of bandwidth.

Right? I think it's overdue for the average computer to have more than a 1Gbps NIC. Something has to push the development of the infrastructure. It's still too expensive to get full 10Gb switches for the types of installs we do at the small end of the market. 10Gb NICs are still too expensive as well. I'm ready for the shift!
 
This project stalled at the end of the year. Picking it back up. Client understands that it would only be about 2.5 Gbps instead of 10 because of the server bottleneck. This is more of a proof of concept. If it works we'll end up with about 5 users on the 10G network. And we'll likely upgrade the server at that point.

Since I posted it looks like there's a new option

About 1/3 the price. But, I like the 16 XG better for the flexibility.
 
Just checking the basics when you mentioned using CAT6

CAT6 - maximum distance of 55m at 10GB
CAT6a - Maximum distance of 100m at 10GB

I've known many people use CAT6 and CAT6 interchangeably when speaking. So just make sure you have the right stuff and the right distances.


Probably not too much I can help you with beyond that. We use 10GB in a several places but it's all DAC or multimode fibre between servers, switches, firewalls etc. Never done 10GB to a desktop because we've never had the need.

I would love to see 2.5Gb NIC's appearing on desktops though. Seems like the next logical step. It's starting to get more common in switches due to Wifi6 and the the pricing isn't astronomical. Better yet it works on CAT5e up to 100m!
 
Back
Top