thecomputerguy
Well-Known Member
- Reaction score
- 1,412
I submitted a request for a quote from my Dell rep and he almost refused to set me up with a RAID1/RAID1
I told him I wanted about 1TB usable for storage and requested:
2x300GB 10k - 300GB 10k (OS) is the cheapest dell offers, next cheapest is the 200GB SSD
2x1TB Near Line SAS 7200RPM (DATA)
PERC H330 Raid Controller
After having a conversation with him explaining what I wanted he still sent me a quote for 4x 600GB 10k's. 3x in a RAID 5 for 1.2 Usable with an OS partition, and an extra 600GB 10k as a hot spare.
I personally prefer RAID1/RAID1 for recover-ability in the event that worst case I need to pull a drive and slave it to a test machine for recovery.
He was adamant that I should be a RAID 5 even after my requests. He eventually reluctantly sent me a quote per my request, which came out cheaper than his 4x600GB 10k's to boot.
Does anyone see anything wrong with staying in a RAID1/RAID1 for a basic file server/DC?
I told him I wanted about 1TB usable for storage and requested:
2x300GB 10k - 300GB 10k (OS) is the cheapest dell offers, next cheapest is the 200GB SSD
2x1TB Near Line SAS 7200RPM (DATA)
PERC H330 Raid Controller
After having a conversation with him explaining what I wanted he still sent me a quote for 4x 600GB 10k's. 3x in a RAID 5 for 1.2 Usable with an OS partition, and an extra 600GB 10k as a hot spare.
I personally prefer RAID1/RAID1 for recover-ability in the event that worst case I need to pull a drive and slave it to a test machine for recovery.
He was adamant that I should be a RAID 5 even after my requests. He eventually reluctantly sent me a quote per my request, which came out cheaper than his 4x600GB 10k's to boot.
Does anyone see anything wrong with staying in a RAID1/RAID1 for a basic file server/DC?