Comparison of Imaging Software - PLEASE READ

Vicenarian

Active Member
Reaction score
19
Ok, I know Bryce made a recent post asking what Imaging software we all use, but I wanted to put out an actual comparison chart for all the popular options. Here are the most popular products people on here seem to use:

Norton Ghost, Acronis True Image, Clonezilla, DriveImage XML (Please feel free to add whatever other imaging software you use)

And finally, here are the categories of evaluation for each of the software products:





Cost: What does it cost?

License: What type of license does it have (annually recurring whereby you have to purchase every year, or indefinite use)

Useful Features: What useful features (in relation to disk management and imaging) does the software have, that sets it apart from the competition?

Format: Does it use a proprietary format to store images, or not?

Can it create an image offline?: Yes/No, and what method does it use (linux CD, BartPE CD, WinPE CD, etc.)

Can it restore an image offline?: Yes/No, and what method does it use (linux CD, BartPE CD, WinPE CD, etc.)

Can Images Be Explored for Files?: Yes/No, and by what method?

Speed: Tell us how long it generally takes to create a ~20 GB image file.

Size: Does the software use compression? Yes/No. If so, how well does it work?

Hardware Compatibility: Does the software recognize most drives, etc. you throw at it, through diff. interfaces (USB, SATA, PATA, etc.)?

Known Issues: Are there any known issues you have had with the product that would discourage other users from purchasing it?

Ability to Sucessfully Clone Bad Sectors and Restore a Working Image to a New Drive?: Yes/No

Can Backup To: Network/USB/etc. Please list.

PLEASE feel free to suggest any other categories you feel would be useful.

And please, if you have used any of these products, please contribute by filling in the details for that particular product. I think this chart will make an invaluable resource for all technicians here. Thanks again!
 
I'll start:



CLONEZILLA:


Cost: Free

License: Indefinite Use

Useful Features: Haven't used it enough to tell.

Format: It uses a proprietary format I think?

Can it create an image offline?: Yes, it is a live CD.

Can it restore an image offline?: Yes, it is a live CD.

Can Images Be Explored for Files?: Yes, but not easily or natively. You can by restoring the image to a virtual machine, or by mounting the image via linux through a weird workaround. Kind of a hassle.

Speed: Can't remember off the top of my head...anybody know?

Size: Yes, it uses compression. It seems to work pretty well.

Hardware Compatibility: It has picked up all drives I have thrown at it so far in my limited usage.

Known Issues: Don't know.

Can restore to smaller sized destination partition? No.

Ability to Sucessfully Clone Bad Sectors and Restore a Working Image to a New Drive?: Yes, with "rescue" switch in options. Haven't tried this, just read about it somewhere.

Can Backup To: Network, HDD.

*******************************************************
 
Ok, I know Bryce made a recent post asking what Imaging software we all use, but I wanted to put out an actual comparison chart for all the popular options. Here are the most popular products people on here seem to use:

Norton Ghost, Acronis True Image, Clonezilla, DriveImage XML (Please feel free to add whatever other imaging software you use)

And finally, here are the categories of evaluation for each of the software products:


TIH 2010


Cost: About 30 bucks.

License: Indefinite

Useful Features: Can restore to different sized drives and SSD's.

Format: Yes

Can it create an image offline?: Yes, Live CD or USB flash.

Can it restore an image offline?: Yes, Live CD or USB flash.

Can Images Be Explored for Files?: Yes either online or offline.

Speed: I can backup and restore 500gb SATA in less then 40 minutes.
Size: Yes - I use standard compression but there is option for higher compression.
Hardware Compatibility: Yes

Known Issues: Not yet - been using since first released.

Ability to Sucessfully Clone Bad Sectors and Restore a Working Image to a New Drive?: Sometimes.

Can Backup To: Network/USB/etc. Yes.

Acronis has only failed me when I failed Acronis.
 
PLEASE feel free to suggest any other categories you feel would be useful.

"hardware independent restore"
- take an image from one machine and restore it on another machine that has different hardware without blue screening

I use shadowprotect which does this. Im not sure as its been awhile since I used Acronis, but I think I heard recently that this does it too.
 
Clonezilla will not clone a drive/partition with any bad sectors. Makes it limited for use with dying drives.
 
Back
Top