The technology of competitive gaming events like Fortnite Battle Royale

timeshifter

Well-Known Member
Reaction score
2,384
Location
USA
My son and I are both really into Fortnite Battle Royale. Epic games recently hosted a big event for this game at E3 this week.

https://www.epicgames.com/fortnite/en-US/pro-am2018?sessionInvalidated=true

I'm really curious about the hardware and software technology they use to put together an event like this.

If you didn't know, in Fortnite Battle Royale 100 players start the game on one large map. The last man standing wins. Easy to do when everyone is sitting at home with their computer, Xbox or PS4 and connecting to a server on the Internet. But how do you do that at a live event?

Obviously you need 100 PCs. I presume that the game server would be on the local LAN. It's normally on the cloud only and there is no downloadable software or way to run your own server that I'm aware of. I think Epic Games keeps that under wraps.

The event was streamed live on Twitch.tv. That adds more software and likely hardware complexity, not to mention Internet bandwidth and quality networking.

I've often thought it would be cool to put a local event like this together. Seems you'd need $100,000 worth of hardware at a minimum (100 $1,000 gaming PCs). I suppose gamers could bring their own PC, but you'd have the potential problem of fairness and cheating / hacks.

Anyone been exposed to this kind of stuff and know more about what goes on?
 
Heh - This used to be the norm before fast Internet for gaming. I even threw a few tourneys back when. (Quake 3, UT, etc.) Back then it was BYOB (Bring Your Own Box) but we provided the server(s), switches, Ethernet cable and tables. The big switches were the only expense as I remember as a few of us owned game server level machines.

I struggle to enjoy last-man standing games. Too much downtime.
 
Last edited:
H1Z1 is the same concept except there's vehicles you can drive. I liked that a little better than fortnite. I can only play about an hour by myself. If I have friends online it's definitely more fun to play. It's so hit or miss though when I can get time to play so I'm not very good at either lol.
 
I've often thought it would be cool to put a local event like this together. Seems you'd need $100,000 worth of hardware at a minimum (100 $1,000 gaming PCs). I suppose gamers could bring their own PC, but you'd have the potential problem of fairness and cheating / hacks

I'm not sure how they arrange it but if its a serious competition wouldn't they need to be able to install their own keyboard, mouse, drivers? I play a lot of destiny 2 for example and without installing my logitech mouse drivers theres a slight difference in cursor speed which would be kind of crippling for fps and rts games.
 
Agreed. None of the charities have been mentioned in anything I’ve seen.

Well the thing about charity prizes is that even if you win or lose the money is still going to a charity you are just competing to decide which charity gets it. Unless you sit there and really do research on it chances are you aren't going to make a good choice. One of the winners gave his cut of $500,000 to Alzheimer's Association sounds like a good choice right? Well 73.4% money goes to actual programs but of that money going to programs 72.9% goes to public education and awareness, 16.1% research, 4.7% chapter services. So thats what like 59k going to research? Perhaps if another person won they would have picked Fisher Center for Alzheimer's Research Foundation which puts 90.8% of the money to programs and of that money 91.6% goes to research grants, 6.5% information programs, 1.3% grant to NYU langone school of medicine.
 
So donating money to the Alzheimer's Association is a bad choice and donating to the Fisher Center for Alzheimer's Research Foundation is a good one?
 
So donating money to the Alzheimer's Association is a bad choice and donating to the Fisher Center for Alzheimer's Research Foundation is a good one?

Well thats my opinion, most are already aware of alzheimers so I think the money is better spent on research. Its just an example, the prize is being responsible for an important decision which in my opinion is a crappy prize.
 
Back
Top