Time for shops to start reselling VPN services....

fencepost

Well-Known Member
Reaction score
2,314
Location
Schaumburg, IL
(US Only)ISPs can now sell your browsing history without permission, thanks to the Senate

Been visiting sites for family member medical conditions? Expect to see targeted advertising coming your way now that privacy protections are on the way of the dodo. Anyone here think Comcast will refrain from selling your name, address, and the number of times you visited hairlossformen.com? How about Sprint, Verizon, AT&T, T-Mobile, etc? Think they might be interested in a few extra $$ from advertising companies or data aggregators?

Yeesh.
 
(US Only)ISPs can now sell your browsing history without permission, thanks to the Senate

Been visiting sites for family member medical conditions? Expect to see targeted advertising coming your way now that privacy protections are on the way of the dodo. Anyone here think Comcast will refrain from selling your name, address, and the number of times you visited hairlossformen.com? How about Sprint, Verizon, AT&T, T-Mobile, etc? Think they might be interested in a few extra $$ from advertising companies or data aggregators?

Yeesh.
There were rumblings about this here in Australia as well, not sure where we're up to regarding it. Might do some research when time permits.
 
I thought Republicans respected privacy and valued less gov't. *sarcasm*

The government should keep its hands out of private business. If there's a market, you'll be able to purchase a connection that will not monitor your usage or sell the information to advertisers. If you can't afford that dedicated business fiber line to your mansion, that's your problem and you should get more money.
 
The government should keep its hands out of private business. If there's a market, you'll be able to purchase a connection that will not monitor your usage or sell the information to advertisers. If you can't afford that dedicated business fiber line to your mansion, that's your problem and you should get more money.
I don't understand why I have to buy my privacy of which I'm guaranteed in the Constitution. Seems un-American IMO.
 
Look, it's a free market. If there's demand for affordable broadband with privacy then obviously someone will provide it, and conversely if nobody provides it then clearly there's not adequate demand.

Don't you start trying to stifle innovation!
 
Plenty of VPN's out there, not to mention Tor. But if they do not properly configure the browser it can be a mute point. And if your using logins to sites it's also a mute point.
 
Here, charter is king. Horrible customer service. Internet goes out for 24 hours at least once a month. But, connection speed is minimum 50mbps. The nearest competitor is 3mbps. And they cost the same amount. So when people say there is competition, all I can do is laugh in their face.

Of charter starts selling our info, with no competition, I don't see us being able to change anything. My county, the state government, has 85,000 people in it. My entire state has less than 500,000 people in it. There isn't enough people to bring another competitor in.
 
Look, it's a free market. If there's demand for affordable broadband with privacy then obviously someone will provide it, and conversely if nobody provides it then clearly there's not adequate demand.

Don't you start trying to stifle innovation!
I still can't tell if this is sarcasm or not lol.
 
Here, charter is king. Horrible customer service. Internet goes out for 24 hours at least once a month. But, connection speed is minimum 50mbps. The nearest competitor is 3mbps. And they cost the same amount. So when people say there is competition, all I can do is laugh in their face.

Of charter starts selling our info, with no competition, I don't see us being able to change anything. My county, the state government, has 85,000 people in it. My entire state has less than 500,000 people in it. There isn't enough people to bring another competitor in.

Actually around here Charter (now Spectrum Communications) is pretty good. I lose power more than I lose Internet. Never a wait for business phone support and rarely a wait for residential phone support. Most service appointments happen in a day or two and they are always right on time. ...and nothing can touch their Internet speeds (20, 60, 100, 300 Mbs on copper). The guys I've worked with in the field are great.

...and back on topic. It's mostly consumer ignorance that has hindered the uptake of VPN. If they had any idea they were so traceable on the net. Even among geeks VPN and Tor discussions are a bit murky. Targeted advertising is now being done from browser cookies. How long before it is done through IP address aggregation? It's easy to use Private or Incognito browsing (which are unknown to 75% of users) to dodge the internal tracking (among other things), but not so easy to cloak an IP.
 
Last edited:
Plenty of VPN's out there, not to mention Tor. But if they do not properly configure the browser it can be a mute point. And if your using logins to sites it's also a mute point.

Did you ever wonder why the majority of funding for TOR is....from the US Gov't...various agencies including the NSA.

TOR was originally created by out military...back then..."onion routing"
 
Already tweeted on this. Thanks to a couple here, I borrowed your writing. Also, anyone know a good VPN reseller?

NorthTexasConsulting‏ @notxconsulting 4m 4 minutes ago
@realDonaldTrump I don't understand why I have to buy my privacy of which I'm guaranteed in the Constitution. Seems un-American IMO.

NorthTexasConsulting ‏@notxconsulting 7m 7 minutes ago
@realDonaldTrump WTG overturning consumer privacy laws enacted by the FCC. I thought Republicans respected privacy and valued less gov't.
 
I tell folks that there are different levels of security, and that your security measures will need to vary depending on what and who you're concerned about.
  1. If you're only concerned about keeping out the "casually curious," don't leave your WiFi open and don't use outdated protocols (802.11b with WEP, WPA, TKIP, WPS with PIN). Different levels here are comparable to either locking your screen door, closing the front door, or locking the front door. They won't stop the motivated and skilled. This same kind of level (with a different focus) can apply to how staff use email and the Internet in general.
  2. If you're concerned about the motivated and skilled, you need to do things to stop targeted attacks. That may mean people trying to crack WiFi encryption so take steps to prevent that from being a problem (key rotations, WPA2 Enterprise vs Personal, client VPNs on WiFi, etc.), or it may mean spearphishing with targeted email with malicious attachments. This is also where you really need to start looking at human factors and serious network segregation and monitoring - why try to crack your WiFi if I can get someone a temp job cleaning your offices?
  3. High-budget motivated and skilled changes a lot of things - the steps you'd take at lower levels may help here, but if you have information on your network that someone would pay $50,000 to get from you, then there's a pretty good chance they're going to get it and it may not involve your computers at all - just janitorial staff or even a skilled new employee. Frankly, I don't have any clients that I'd consider to be at this level - or if they are, I don't know about it and I'm not sure they do either.
  4. Governments and government agencies. If you're being directly targeted by someone who can be considered to have effectively unlimited resources and you're an organization of any significant size, it's going to be very hard to provide security that will protect your secrets.
The effort for level 1 is all the stuff you really need to be doing anyway - firewalling, antivirus/antimalware, patching, smart WiFi policies, simple user training, etc. Most customers probably should be somewhere at the high end for level 2, but honestly are more likely to be in the midrange - background checks, better employees and a little more training, Business Associate Agreements, device policies, an extra layer of email filtering, servers in a locked closet, etc. but probably not a network configured to lock out ports or segregate them at the hardware level when unknown MACs are detected, server room access monitoring and 24/7 camera surveillance, etc.

In theory hospitals and the like should probably be somewhere between the top end of level 2 and ideally somewhere into level 3. That's going to include the network-level lockouts I mentioned ("Only systems blessed by IT and with their MACs known get connected to internal networks"), more active auditing of activity and possibly automated lockouts for strange activity patterns, more separate logins to discrete systems, 2-factor auth for more places, maybe even integration of work schedules and access controls to systems ("Jane's not scheduled this week and she's in pediatrics, so why is she looking at medical records for cardiac patients?"). I don't work directly with any hospitals, but I've seen a lot of tightening of hospital system security assisting customers who are connecting to hospital portals.

If you need to be concerned about level-4 stuff you're definitely not my customer, but the basic options are: It's your own government looking into you and you have serious problems, or it's some other government looking into you and you'd best enlist the assistance of your own to counter it.
 
As far as Tor, or anything else, is concerned if someone is doing something that is going to attract the wrong kind of attention from a nation state, they're going to have much bigger problems.

Remember that a lot of what we have came from US DoD. TCP/IP networking and the internet. And the list goes on. Given that Tor's source code is open and LEA has had such a hard time closing down target's I think it's safe enough. As long as your not conspiring to make an Ebola bomb. LOL!!!

As @Diggs mentioned, it's not suitable for streaming. But regular web surfing, email, etc. it's fine. And if your using it on a public network it's more than fine as most of them rate limit each connection anyways to just a couple of meg or so.
 
Back
Top