Porthos
Well-Known Member
- Reaction score
- 13,986
- Location
- San Antonio Tx
And the WD is a little more expensive.WD owns Sandisk, the only difference is the label.
And the WD is a little more expensive.WD owns Sandisk, the only difference is the label.
Also, anyone preferring Sandisk over Western Digital Blue SSD, shouldn't. WD owns Sandisk, the only difference is the label.
No, sorry. On a budget, that is as good as it will get.Thanks for the feedback @labtech . It's appreciated. Do you have a "favorite" economy SSD?
This would be my other contender (by Sandisk) for a low end SSD as the price is the same ($50) as Kingston -
https://www.amazon.com/SanDisk-120G...=1518884580&sr=8-2&keywords=sandisk+120gb+ssd
That's good. Their users should be thankful.I've installed quite a few Kingston drives in my time and haven't gotten any back with failures. I can say that they're generally slower than even other TLC drives, but I'm not sure they're necessarily less reliable than comparable TLC drives of other brands.
I'm fairly certain that's because all WD branded devices have an Acronis license attached.And the WD is a little more expensive.
Iv'e sold dozens of Kingston SSD to all kinds of people for all kinds of uses. They've been used in Gaming PC and Laptops, Students, Business laptops, kids, residential etc. Never had an issue.Careful with Kingston SSDs,
Careful with Kingston SSDs,
WD green and blue are now the same drive. They combined the models into one name.We have given up selling the WD Green & SanDisk drives as they are simply too slow. The WD Blue are so much faster until you look at M.2 which more than doubles the speed again.We have 15 WD Blue 250 & 5 WD Blue 500's in stock, its very rare to sell the 1TB ones
WD green and blue are now the same drive. They combined the models into one name.
Yeah, I was talking about the mechanical drives.Not on the SSD front, the WD Green runs 545 read and 440 write while the WD Blue uses 3D NAND and runs 545 read and 525 write making all the difference.
Many of us donteven consider those very often. SSD is now...Yeah, I was talking about the mechanical drives.
Agreed, I always quote SSD and if I get push back I quote WD Black. That's it for workstations.Many of us donteven consider those very often. SSD is now...
Gold and Black both have a 5-year warranty, but I would be more concerned about Golds in a single disk environment due to the TLER difference and the rarity of donor drive parts if necessary for data recovery. Unless you are using the Gold drive in a mirror or parity array, I think Black is the better option of the two.I stopped using WD Black, when I realized that WD Gold could be had for less money in many cases. Server grade and superior warranty for a lower price? yes please!
The Golds are actually Hitachi drives, which are famous for longevity. At my favourite supplier (Canada Computers), Golds are $10-$15 more than Blacks, but I'm surprised the difference is so small. Each to his/her own, but I'll take Golds over Blacks if they're for me, and Blacks if they're for a cost-conscious customer.Gold and Black both have a 5-year warranty, but I would be more concerned about Golds in a single disk environment due to the TLER difference and the rarity of donor drive parts if necessary for data recovery. Unless you are using the Gold drive in a mirror or parity array, I think Black is the better option of the two.