Prayers for Las Vegas

9879d99d4edf58e45f41b4286945321a.jpg


No, you really don't understand the Amercian Psyche. We want everything our Government has up to and including tanks.

Good luck with that.

What's the root cause of these things, if there even is one? Is it cultural, mental illness, weapon prevalence, human nature?

The answer is staring us right in the face.
 
Last edited:
What's the root cause of these things, if there even is one? Is it cultural, mental illness, weapon prevalence, human nature?

We have the same weapons we had 30, 40, 50 years ago. Semi automatics were around in the 60's and 70's..well...quite earlier.
The guns haven't changed...society changed!

There's a meme going around (normally I dismiss them as quite inaccurate, or at least very exaggerated..but I think this one is at least 75% accurate)...all 8 of the last mass shooters were on some psych meds. This Paddock guy from las vegas, news broke out the other day he was on anti anxiety meds..and a kind that can lead to violent outbursts.

I've said it before...I'll say it again..the laws must loosen up to allow cross reference into med records for the purpose of a gun purchase.
 
The Constitution is not etched in stone. There are established procedures to change it. Get busy. Do the job the correct way and struggle through the debates which will be bound to occur. Make your case. Otherwise all you are having is a temper tantrum.
 

Considering this is the same guy that said the U.S. government is using juice boxes to “make children gay,” and started the whole hilarious Pizzagate thing....no, I don't think that will be confirmed. If this is your "news source" I don't think we need to pursue your arguments any further.

The guns haven't changed...society changed!

They did not have AR-15s when the 2nd Amendment was written. Have a look here for a quick, 30-second demonstration of the difference.

"I've said it before...I'll say it again..the laws must loosen up to allow cross reference into med records for the purpose of a gun purchase.

The guy that shot up Las Vegas apparently had no record or 5150s whatsoever. So while background checks are good, bringing back some actual restrictions (and most of these guys have bought their guns legally) is even better.
 
Considering this is the same guy that said the U.S. government is using juice boxes to “make children gay,” and started the whole hilarious Pizzagate thing....no, I don't think that will be confirmed. If this is your "news source" I don't think we need to pursue your arguments any further.

It was the number 4 google search result for "Vegas ISIS" and number 1 for "Vegas ISIS Tape". Try it for yourself if yo don't believe me. Also note that I said I am waiting for confirmation. Where do you get your fake news from?
 
You're cherry picking for convenience there. I've shot AR-15's before. I've shot full automatics before. I've shot old school black powder guns before.

Let's go back to my prior statement...and let's read each work of my entire quote please. "We have the same weapons we had 30, 40, 50 years ago. Semi automatics were around in the 60's and 70's..well...quite earlier.
The guns haven't changed...society changed!"

Reads a bit different when you include my entire context, doesn't it?

The second amendment was written with ink, feather quill, and parchment paper, in rooms heated only by pot belly stoves burning wood. Yes I know technology was different back then. They did not have explosive bombs, and trucks to drive into crowds, which is what that guy in your cute little video realistically would have turned to if he wanted to take out all the people in that room.

Nor did they have the crazy medical medication that messes with todays minds, over prescribed by doctors trying to get their spiffs from big pharma by prescribing tons of their pills.

For the record, I'm not a "pro crazy 88 kajillion round full magazine on full automatic weapons gimme tanks too" gun nut. My like my political lean, I'm tend towards the middle of the road, which is a realistic expectation and usually where a good compromise is. "Compromise"..a word much of todays millenials aren't used to working with, it's their way, or their way, or they..pout really badly and throw tantrums cuz they're used to getting their way.

I live in the state of CT which has very tight gun laws, and I fully support that. I support the move to remove silencers from the market. I support the move to make bump stocks illegal. But to be quite blunt...those are easily, easily obtained anyways (there are underground "black markets" ya know)...or made (I've shot a gun with a home made silencer that a friend of mine made..they're quite easy...mostly just a bunch of washers in a tube!..you're not going to get washers at the hardware store outlawed!)

We have to be realistic...guns are not going to be outlawed in this country. We have to find a balance. And, in my strong opinion, we have to do much...much better and more thorough background checks. I don't mind that, matter of fact, I support that. Personally, I think owning guns is a privilege, not a right. Much like driving a car...a privilege, not a right. Not all gun owners are "nut jobs". 99.99999& of them are fully responsible.
 
It was the number 4 google search result for "Vegas ISIS" and number 1 for "Vegas ISIS Tape". Try it for yourself if yo don't believe me. Also note that I said I am waiting for confirmation. Where do you get your fake news from?
Why is it so damn important that this be terrorism? People seem to be going out the way to try and tie this to real terrorism.
 
Pretty much.
So based on the trivial list of evidence techlady provided and you just confirmed, infowars must comparatively have a stellar record and must be by definition the most trusted news source on the planet.

[
Very Small Subset of CNN Lies
/QUOTE]


Like I asked techlady, where do you get your fake news from so we can examine further?

Like I asked techlady, where do you get your fake news from so we can examine further?
 
Why is it so damn important that this be terrorism? People seem to be going out the way to try and tie this to real terrorism.

Why do you make things up? Like I already said. It is too premature to make definitive claims. In fact I admit time could prove your rush to judgement to be correct. Time will tell.
 
So based on the trivial list of evidence techlady provided and you just confirmed, infowars must comparatively have a stellar record and must be by definition the most trusted news source on the planet.
No, I dismissed Alex Jones about 20 years ago. His M.O. is simple. Take any event and propose the most outlandish scenario possible. Every event is a conspiracy to this guy. Odds are that he has to be right about some things, he can't be right about all of them, or even most of them.
 
No, I dismissed Alex Jones about 20 years ago. His M.O. is simple. Take any event and propose the most outlandish scenario possible. Every event is a conspiracy to this guy. Odds are that he has to be right about some things, he can't be right about all of them, or even most of them.
You could just as well be talking about CNN...
 
I won't comment so much on gun control, America grew up in a unique way where I don't believe us Australians and British can say too much beyond "it worked for us".
The US is a unique situation.

What I will comment on is mental health and media. I do believe a lot of these people aren't getting the help they need, America is one of the only first world countries that doesn't have universal healthcare. The system probably wouldn't have been able to help them all, but I feel a few of the shootings might not have happened with good accessibility to care.

Something I find crazy as an outsider is how American media covers these shooters.

MASSACRE! Stephan Paddock! 58 KILLED! 489 WOUNDED! NEW HIGH SCORE! DING! DING! DING!
*Shows the shooters face for weeks*

The American media makes them famous and these guys want to go down in history as famous. It encourages new crazies to do the same.

I can name a number of American shooters but I can only think of one Australian one, who was the one who triggered our gun crackdown.

Australian media when talking about them only refer to "the shooter", rather than their name. I've been to the place of the Australian massacre and they don't even mention anything about the event other than a small plaque commemorating the victims (the location was historically interesting before the shooting).

I really think American media needs to change.
 

That chart makes a lot of sense to me. I have to say most of the items on the right are pretty logical. My main issue is just the general theme here though, we really need to find commonality between all of these attacks to look for real solutions. I went to Sandy Hook Elementary as a kid, that **** affects me on a personal level. Believe me, if I thought banning all fire arms would stop that violence for good, I would be on board. It isn't even about retaining freedoms, which I find to be critical. I just don't think banning firearms altogether would stop those crazy people from inflicting damage some way or another. The violent act is the problem, not the tool used.
 
I won't comment so much on gun control, America grew up in a unique way where I don't believe us Australians and British can say too much beyond "it worked for us".
The US is a unique situation.

What I will comment on is mental health and media. I do believe a lot of these people aren't getting the help they need, America is one of the only first world countries that doesn't have universal healthcare. The system probably wouldn't have been able to help them all, but I feel a few of the shootings might not have happened with good accessibility to care.

Something I find crazy as an outsider is how American media covers these shooters.

MASSACRE! Stephan Paddock! 58 KILLED! 489 WOUNDED! NEW HIGH SCORE! DING! DING! DING!
*Shows the shooters face for weeks*

The American media makes them famous and these guys want to go down in history as famous. It encourages new crazies to do the same.

I can name a number of American shooters but I can only think of one Australian one, who was the one who triggered our gun crackdown.

Australian media when talking about them only refer to "the shooter", rather than their name. I've been to the place of the Australian massacre and they don't even mention anything about the event other than a small plaque commemorating the victims (the location was historically interesting before the shooting).

I really think American media needs to change.
I couldn't agree with you more. The media has had a terrible role to play in our culture and political spectrum. It seems like trueing up the FCC and reeling that stuff in would be a good move. I don't think these places should even be allowed to call themselves " News Entertainment".
 
What I will comment on is mental health and media. I do believe a lot of these people aren't getting the help they need, America is one of the only first world countries that doesn't have universal healthcare. The system probably wouldn't have been able to help them all, but I feel a few of the shootings might not have happened with good accessibility to care.

Could not agree more. Access to mental health care slowly became obliterated in this country at the same time restrictions on deadly weapons also got obliterated (i.e. the federal assault rifle ban that expired in 2004). Clearly, this is a very bad combination. And our completely broken medical care system is nothing short of shameful.

Something I find crazy as an outsider is how American media covers these shooters. I really think American media needs to change.

Also agree. Since we have no real public service broadcasting channels or anything like the BBC, our corporate overlords have decided to simply go with whatever sells. Turns out sex and death sells. This is where the "invisible hand of the free market" determines what should get shoved in our faces, and we have a lot of people that don't seem to realize this is what they're voting for when they vote with the party that is all about privatization.

I don't think a complete ban on all guns is ever going to happen, or even possible. I get it. But I do think we need some significant policy changes. I think it's very obvious everything we're doing now isn't working (which happens to be pretty close to nothing). Lots of gun owners are finally getting fed up with our non-stop massacres and insane gun policies, too. Pretty enlightened take here, by a woman who's been a lifelong gun owner: I Am A Gun Owner, And Here Are 8 Things I Have To Say About Gun Control. It's a quick read, and the author is a gun owner herself and does believe in the home protection argument.
 
Back
Top