shamrin
Active Member
- Reaction score
- 48
- Location
- Lexington, Ky
My general practice has been to recommend a new hard drive whenever I get a drive with even a single bad sector on it. My reasoning is that drives don't get better and often fail spontaneously, why take the risk? With hard drive prices now doubling, and it looks like they might stay there for a while, I'm thinking about re-thinking that advice.
I've been using HDD Regenerator for a while now on some of the failing drives I get with very good results. It fairly consistently will get a failing drive to the point where I can image it which is exactly what I needed. I'm wondering if anyone has long-term experience with drives that have been "regenerated". Do they stay fixed normally or fail again? It seems that if a drive has maybe just one or two bad sectors, and they can actually be fixed "permanently", some customers might appreciate the option of hanging on to the existing drive.
I've been using HDD Regenerator for a while now on some of the failing drives I get with very good results. It fairly consistently will get a failing drive to the point where I can image it which is exactly what I needed. I'm wondering if anyone has long-term experience with drives that have been "regenerated". Do they stay fixed normally or fail again? It seems that if a drive has maybe just one or two bad sectors, and they can actually be fixed "permanently", some customers might appreciate the option of hanging on to the existing drive.